South American Real Estate News

Slide gateway to south america's news resource Brings you local news and views from the region Experienced Investment news local knowledge information resource for investors real estate marketing Gateway to South America Real Estate News line Icon home Icon home Icon home brokerage services Click here now for real - estate opportunities Experienced argentina brazil chile paraguay peru uruguay agro business lifestyle real estate marketing Gateway to South America Real Estate Services high end residential Farm investment tours Icon home Icon home Icon home Icon home brokerage services
Slide Real Estate News Service South American Focused 1000's Of Happy Subscribers Argentina - Brazil - Chile- Paraguay - Peru - Uruguay Bilingual Posts Free Subscriptions

Argentine and Brazil agribusiness have an “ecological surplus”

Post available in: English Español

Economist Nicolás Torre, from the IERAL Institute of the Mediterranean Foundation, published an extensive thread on the social network Twitter, highlighting that both Argentina and Brazil have a positive “ecological footprint”. That is, they have more natural resources available than those they consume annually to survive.

Torre’s report came in response to accusations against South America in recent weeks. First by The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, when he said that Brazil does not adequately care for the Amazon; and then by the young Swedish activist, Greta Thunberg, who accused five countries, including Argentina and Brazil, of inaction in the face of global warming.

Specifically, Torre used as a basis a system called “Ecological Footprint accounting”, designed in 1990 by two researchers from Columbia University, which translates as “Accounting of the Ecological Footprint” and that measures the demand and supply of natural resources in a given territory (a country, a continent or the entire planet).

There are two key terms. The first is the “ecological footprint” that measures the ecological assets required by a given population to produce the natural resources it consumes and to absorb its waste, especially carbon emissions. In terms of supply, “biocapacity” is calculated, which is the productivity of ecological assets, both in their ability to generate food and to absorb waste (C02).

Both concepts are expressed in global hectares; which are globally comparable standardized hectares with global average productivity.

Thus, if a country has an ecological footprint that exceeds its biocapacity, it is considered to have an “ecological deficit” and ends up meeting its demand by importing resources, liquidating its own ecological assets (such as overfishing), and/or emitting dioxide from surplus carbon to the atmosphere.

Conversely, if the biocapacity exceeds the footprint, it is considered an “Ecological Reserve”. Or, as opposed to the deficit, you could say a “surplus.”

The evaluations are up-to-date until 2012 and, in the case of Argentina, indicate that it has a biocapacity greater than its ecological footprint. “Argentina’s population almost doubled in the last 60 years and the ecological offer per capita declined. But the footprint remains around four global hectares,” Torre said.

Similarly, Brazil has more resources than it consumes, far from what European leaders express that it should “take care of its ecology” in order to join the EU-Mercosur agreement.

These assertions, as far as Argentina is concerned, are in line with the statement made by the Directorate-General for Environmental Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which challenges the conclusion reached by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that agro is Argentina’s second largest carbon emitter.

According to the IPCC, agricultural production is responsible for the 39 of greenhouse gas emissions, with livestock being the activity with the greatest impact on the final result.

The Directorate of Environmental Affairs states that measurement only takes emissions into account, and that it leaves aside one key aspect: it does not contemplate the carbon sequestration that domestic agricultural production makes.

Source: AgroVoz

Contact the Gateway to South America team to learn about the best investment opportunities in the region. The company is a benchmark for foreign investors wishing to invest in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay, providing expert advice on property acquisition.

(Visited 102 times, 1 visits today)
Gateway to South America

About Gateway to South America

Gateway to South America was established in 2006 as a single office in Buenos Aires. The company has since expanded into a vibrant regional network, servicing the Southern Cone clients in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay with professional real estate marketing services. If you enjoy reading our news site please share it on your social media below.

Post available in: English Español


Comments from our readers

Visit us on LinkedInVisit us on FacebookVisit us on TwitterVisit us on Pinterest